Judged by outcomes.
The matters below reflect selected results obtained for our clients. Client names and identifying facts have been omitted or generalized where appropriate to preserve confidentiality. Each matter turns on its own facts and law, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Prevailed Against VOGUE Owner in Precedential Trademark Trial
We represented Fashion Electronics, Inc. in a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board opposition brought by Advance Magazine Publishers Inc., owner of the VOGUE mark. After trial, the Board accepted our laches defense as to most challenged goods and rejected the remaining likelihood-of-confusion claim. The Board permitted registration of the EVOGUE mark.
Advance Magazine Publishers Inc. v. Fashion Electronics Inc., Opposition No. 91247034 (TTAB June 28, 2023) (precedential).
Obtained Quiet Title and Monetary Judgment Exceeding $2.2 Million
In a Riverside County real estate action, we obtained a judgment quieting title in favor of our client together with a monetary judgment exceeding $2.2 million.
Complete Defense Judgment Following Multi-Week Trial in Sixteen-Party Dispute
We defended employment, partnership, and corporate claims in a sixteen-party action litigated over approximately four years. After a multi-week bench trial at the Stanley Mosk Courthouse, the court entered judgment for our clients on all claims.
Obtained Judgments Exceeding $1.2 Million in Related Shareholder Actions
We represented a client in two related shareholder and derivative actions involving fraud and breach of fiduciary duty. The court entered judgments totaling more than $1.2 million and imposed joint and several liability against the defendants.
Defeated LLC Records Petition and Preserved the Victory on Appeal
We represented an LLC respondent in a writ proceeding under California Corporations Code section 17704.10 seeking inspection and production of company records. The trial court denied the petition.
We continued the representation on appeal, where the Court of Appeal affirmed. The appellate court concluded that the statute did not require the LLC to create nonexistent records or produce tax returns that were not yet available.
Speak with counsel about your matter.
Tell us what happened, what is at stake, and what you need to accomplish. A member of our legal team will respond promptly. Initial communications are treated as confidential, but no attorney‑client relationship is formed until confirmed in writing.
Get in Touch